Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area

tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area

tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area

Has anyone experienced problems in verifying reinforcement area requirements in tilted nozzles?
I’ve some troubles with a 45° degrees downward oriented nozzle type 9.
In computing the limits of reinforcement I usually refer to Article D-5 of ASME VII div.2.
So I find a limit in the normal to the vessel axis direction, then accordingly to ASME VIII- div 2 AD-540.2 I consider as reinforcement area the heavy barrel area comprised underneath the normal to the vessel wall limit H, that for a 45° tilted nozzle has the shape of a parallelogram. I believe that compress in calculating this area is taking into account, in favour of safety, a smaller area than the one actually available. In fact, in cross sectional view, Compress computes the area taking the normal to the vessel limit H times the heavy barrel thickness, tn - trn i.e. Area  = H * (tn - trn), which is the area of a rectangle smaller than the parallelogram; while I’m used to compute the whole area of the parallelogram i.e. A = (H/sin beta) * (tn - trn), where beta is the inclination angle of the tilted  nozzle (in my case 45°).
Can any one explain to me the reason of this choice? Is it a different interpretation of the ASME code?
I remark that this different way of computing the area leads to two different results, what for me is adequate result in a “Not adequate” reinforcement for Compress, with the obvious consequences in the deficiencies report.


RE: tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area

Your approach makes sense. It is a matter of interpretation. The Code does not address the tilted nozzles. In my many years of pressure vessel design, I did not see any calculation done the way you describe it. Probably nobody thought of it?

One note: you need to make sure that the limits of reinforcement measured parallel to the vessel wall are not exceeded.

RE: tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area

Thanks Cheops.
I checked the parallel to the vessel wall limits and they're respected.
Actually the reason that is at the base of my interpretation is that the available area comprised inside the limits (parallel and normal to the vessel wall) stated by ASME,can be considered as reinforcement but, now that you say you've never seen such way of calculation, I'll try to ask directly to ASME.
In the meanwhile any reply is welcome.


RE: tilted nozzle 6 reinforcement area


ASME issues official interpretations. The question is submitted to a committee. Be prepared to wait a long time before you receive an answer.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper – Data Security and Know-How Protection
Our data is constantly exposed to the danger of being intercepted or stolen as it wends its way over global data networks. Data security measures and measures for protecting intellectual property should not, however, first be implemented when data is exchanged – companies must lay the foundation for these measures within their own organization. Download Now
White Paper – Collaboration in the PLM Context
The influence exerted by the Internet of Things (IoT) means that there is a steadily growing need for collaboration in industry. Partners from new industries and areas of application need to be integrated in cross-company business processes to ensure that the lifecycle of smart, connected products can be managed from end to end. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close