×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Macomber Steel Joist
2

Macomber Steel Joist

Macomber Steel Joist

(OP)
Besides SJI, does anyone know where I can find information on the old Macomber Steel Joists?

Jeff

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

Do a search here.  Several old threads about Macomber joists.

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

krus1972 - I managed to contact an architect who sent me pdf's of some Macomber catalogue tables.  I am in the process of getting these uploaded and placed in an FAQ so Eng-tips members can easily access them.  Hopefully we can have them up within the week.

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

(OP)
JAE,

Thanks for your help. What ever information you can find would be most benificial to this Forum.  

A little history to others reading this thread:

SJI can only provide only the required specifications (Loading, Material, etc..) for joists built during the time frame of the Macomber joist.


Much like today joist manufacturers can build steel joists from any shape(s) they want as long as the joist(s) meet SJI specs. Before the days of Vulcraft & Canam (1928-1960), Macomber was a widely known and widely used steel joist manufacturer. It has been a long time since Macomber went out of business but there are still many structures that exist today that have Macomber Joists. Old catalogs are very scarce and its difficult to reverse engineer these joists so they can be evaluated from any engineer. As an engineer it is nearly impossible to evaluate and design structural alterations to buildings that use the Macomber joists.   Today Vulcraft & Canam has engineering departments that aid engineers when modifications/alterations to only their own joists are needed. Since Macomber no longer exists and As-built information on Macomber joists is very scarce it creates a near impossible challenge for todays engineers who have to work with existing Macomber steel joists.

Jeff   

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

HI

I too am looking for table information on the Macomber Joists.  Specifically, I need load table information for the following designations:

18 D V-BM
14 B V-BM
20 D V-BM
18 C V-BM
16 B V-BM
24 SG 0909
24 SG 1009
24 SG 1210
SM

Did the pdfs ever get made?  Has someone posted the old catalogs yet?

Thanks,
struc442

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

(OP)
JAE,

Macomber had many different product lines. "V-BEAM" and "V-LOK" are only two of their many joist product lines. They also had their own decking also.  On the good side the "V-BEAM" is what everyone on ENG-TIPS is looking for and their joist tags support it. The V-BEAM is what I have the info on.

On the Bad side MY project uses the V-LOK joist system and I still do not have the original Macomber product info on the V-LOK system (YET). I designed a work around where none of the joists had to be modified or touched. The V-LOK system did NOT require any welding or bolts to connect all of the joist/joist girders together. If you want to be able to spot V-LOK joist construction just look at the end connections of the joists. They are not your typical Vulcraft bearing connection that everyone is familur with. All of the joists & Girders used strange looking shear connectors that have rivets that stick out and fit into slotted holes in the girder verticals. The system was erected with no welding or bolts and fit together like the old toy erector sets we had when we were kids.   

On the good side I know many old-timer structural engineers who are retired or ready to retire. Since Macomber went out of business around 32-35 years ago these retired guys will most likely have the old product catalogs. The old-timers are not internet/computer savey and thats why people are having a very hard time finding Macomber info.

I will soon change this when more (Authentic) Macomber info becomes available to me.

Jeffrey A. Krus  P.E.

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

Jeff:

Hunt 'em down like dogs and get that info!  heh

One thing we have done, which some may think is "scary" on old joists when you don't know exactly what you have, is to re-do the original design, doing a dead load takeoff of the floor or roof, and then apply the live load (or snow load) that was applicable at the time of the original design.  In our area, years ago most engineers used 30 psf for snow.  Today, with the IBC, the snow is around 21 psf so we have some extra capacity to play with.

You can build an original shear and moment diagram capacity envelope based on these assumed original design loads and then compare with your current loading condition to see where you are at.  The BIG assumption in doing this is that you assume that the original engineer correctly designed the dang things.

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

Eight pages of information (.pdf downloads) on Macomber V-Beams (provided by krus1972 and JAE) is available at the link below. My ONLY contribution is to provide the web hosting.

www.SlideRuleEra.net

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

Here's the FAQ.  In the future, if people post questions as to Macomber Joists, just direct them here:

FAQ679-1104

Thank you very much SlideRuleEra for your assistance in this....

RE: Macomber Steel Joist

"The BIG assumption in doing this is that you assume that the original engineer correctly designed the dang things."

I would think that whether the original engineer "correctly" designed the things, they almost certainly designed them differently from what you would.  Stability formulas for struts and columns have changed, yield strength may have been different, factors of safety or load factors change, they may have treated all elements as pinned in the pre-computer era just to simplify the calculations.  On the other hand, they could have done actual load tests to confirm a questionable design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close