Luckily for us, while a machine could possibly fool the Turing test, the current vogue for AI is a long ways from actually thinking, even more so than, say, 30 years ago. A long time ago (for computing), the thought was that AI should mimic how a human processed data, but nearly every successful AI has wound up using brute force and ignorance: Big Blue, most NLPs, most image recognition. By brute force and ignorance, I mean that they simply train the AI on a dataset and with some amount of supervision (guidance), the AI associates "object" with "label;" there is no "thought" or "thinking" behind the processing, because it turns out that our intuition about how an AI should "think" gets trumped by sheer computing power being able to crank through the data with no regard to what we humans thought was the way it should process the data.
However, the end result is something even worse than enmity, it's complete obliviousness and utter disregard. Thus, there is no need to wipe out the human race, since that wastes resources and simply efficiently pillaging natural resources and not worrying about polluting the environment, since a machine doesn't care about that, they'll eliminate us as a natural byproduct of their dominance of the earth.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list