Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Welding AISI 405

Status
Not open for further replies.

PAN

Mechanical
Apr 25, 2001
549
I found the welding history of a vessel (SA 387 Gr.12 Cl.2) with clad material (AISI 405).

This document shows welding electrode as follows :-
- AWS A5.4 E309 for root pass
- AWS A5.4 E308 for finish pass

In my understanding AWS A5.4 E430 is suitable for welding AISI 405. Should we use E430 instead of E308 during repair? Please comment.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I would not use E430. I would stay with the original welding procedure. 430 S/S can be susceptible to corrosion by some media unless annealed.
 
As unclesyd states, stay away from E430. Clad restoration of 405, 409 & 410S clad carbon and low alloy steels has traditionally been done with E309 first layer and E308 subsequent layers.

 
Thank you unclesyd and stanweld.

Instead of annealing temperature, can we carry out PWHT at lower temperature to improve corrosion resistance?
 
Clad restorations often need not be subject to PWHT. If PWHT is required per NBIC and the Inspector, a Code stress relieving PWHT is all that you may do. You may not anneal!!
 
PAN;
The NBIC references the original code of construction requirements, where possible. In this case because of the nature of repairs, you would require PWHT per UCS-56 in Section VIII if you touch the 1 Cr-1/2 Mo base material. As an alternative, I would refer you to the 2004 Edition of the NBIC, RD-1100, which allows local PWHT - we had approved this alternative PWHT method in 2003.

As an option to the above E309/308 filler metals, I would also consider an Inconel filler metal like Inco 182 or 82 for weld repairs between the ferritic stainless cladding and 1 Cr-1/2 Mo base plate. I believe the Ni-base filler metals would reduce susceptibility to harmful carbide migration along the weld fusion zone during local PWHT and potential cracking in service.
 
While the Nickel base filler metals would normally be recommended if PWHT is required and/or operating temperatures are high due to the more favorable coefficient of expansion matchup and elimination of the carbide precipitation potential when using 309/308, they too may not provide effective corrosion resistance in the specific corrosion environment, especially if it is sulfidic.

The Owner/User of the vessel to be repaired should be consulted with regard to selection of the repair filler metals.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor