view orientation

[bxbzq]

Hi,
In attached simple sketch, when I dimension the relationship of the two datum holes, is there difference between the sheet #1 and #2?
Alternatively, if I orient the view so that the connecting line of the two holes is horizontal, would it be a better practice?

Thanks.

 

[Tunalover]

Seems like either was is sufficient.


Tunalover

 

[notats]

Is -A- either side of the stock thickness? just a guess

 

[bxbzq]

Oh yes, as usual, notats.
To me in sheet #1, it looks the horizontal surface is better candidate for a datum.

 

[ashivu123]

I think sheet 1 is good inspect where as sheet 2 having angular dimension to locate hole locaion seems to be difficult

 

[ctopher]

I agree, sht 1. Need to add datum A.
Profile note, is that the case from front to back also? ;-)

Chris, CSWA
SolidWorks '15
SolidWorks Legion

 

[Jboggs]

My practice of 40 years has always been to orient and dimension views following one main priority: How will the part be used? Put another way: What must the part fit?

If the critical dimension for proper fit with mating parts is the absolute distance between the two holes then sht 2 is preferred. If however the horizontal distance between the two holes is the more critical dimension then sht 1 is preferred. This approach usually provides a very clear path to dimensioning and orientation issues.

 

[CheckerHater]

Am I the only one concerned that in Sht 1 there is not enough dimensions to relate the rest of the part to holes?

"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert"
Arthur C. Clarke Profiles of the future

 

[bxbzq]

Hey, thanks to all.

Chris, I don't follow your question about profile note.

CheckerHater, good point.