Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Using shell mesh for thin parts

Status
Not open for further replies.

hhwu

Mechanical
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1
Location
US
I have a large bridge girder I'm planning to analyze for deflection/stresses. The model is large and made up of generally thin pieces. A normal solid mesh did not work -- I think the program ran out of memory. Shell meshing is recommended to analyze thin parts, but I've never had to employ it.

So I start out with some practice with simple parts. I made three 100x500x5(mm) plates and formed a wide-flange shape with it. Then constrained the end of the wide-flange to a fourth plate to form a cantilever.

After creating a shell study, I picked a surface on each of the plates to represent the structure, and entered 5mm for thickness. Then I created bonded contact sets between all the touching faces of the plates. Finally, I restrained the base plate and applied pressure on the web of the wide-flange. The structure did mesh, but the analysis failed, which leads me to believe there's something wrong with the way I'm constraining/bonding the plates.

Thanks in advance for your help,

- HH
 
When you define your contact set I think you have to select the edge of the surface that you picked when defining the shell. You can not pick a surface that isn´t defined as a shell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top