Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Tubesheet Section III Class 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mumawalde

Mechanical
Jun 24, 2010
33
Where should I go for rules regarding design of flat heads machined into tube sheets for a Section III Class 3 vessel?

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Could you be more specific? What are "flat heads machined into tube sheets," and why does ND-3000 not satisfy you?
 
Yes, sorry for the short post, I wanted to see if I would get any interest in the topic at all.
The actual application is a vertical vessel consisting of three parts. Starting from the bottom of the bottom portion there is a bottom head (16.9 elliptical pipe cap), a section of cylindrical shell, and a weld-neck flange. The second section consists of a flat plate with a multitude of thru holes drilled in it in a pattern. This portion gets sandwiched between the bottom section and the top section. The top section is a weld-neck flange with a pipe cap welded to the top of it.
There are various other nozzles and so forth, but I am mainly interested in how to analyze the middle section. I know the pressure differential on the middle section. I don't see anything explicit in ND (this is a class 3 vessel). Any help would be great. Thanks!
 
I would suggest TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association).
 
Mumawalde, assuming there are two tubesheets on the middle section this sounds like a fixed-tubesheet exchanger, TEMA type BEM. I am not at all familiar with Sec III, but if no specific rules, it could be designed per TEMA as yamoffathoo suggested, Sec VIII, Div 1 Part UHX, or perhaps another code. You will need to review Sec III to see what is permitted.

Regards,

Mike
 
Mumawalde, I believe you are looking for Section III, Division 1, Appendix A, Article A-8000.
 
Thank you all for the help. I have reviewed all suggestions, and in my case am going to use Section VIII Div 1 Part UHX.

While A-8000 seems to be the most applicable at first sight, At the beginning of Section III, Div 1, App A A-8000 there are 5 criteria that must be met, and this design does not meet criteria number 5, since there is a differential pressure on the part, the loading is not "in-plane" and the thickness is not at least twice the hole pitch.

Since the Section VIII approach is readily available to me, I'm going to attempt it.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor