Pavis1968
Materials
- Sep 18, 2006
- 16
I have a question:
Have you had a situation like: to have a thicker wall thickness in flange ending?
for example, consider the 16" flange with ID equal to 16" SCH 40 piping , but need a thicker wall thickness in flange side.
the problem is coming that I have pipeline pipe which is higher grade material like API 5L X52 (SMYS is 52 ksi) but I want to connect this pipe to B16.5 flanges 16" size but SCH 60 because it is A105 (SMYS 36 ksi) , I shall use Fig 1 of ASME B16.5, (internal tapering as Fig 2 ASME B16.5 is not permitted as per Z662 Canadian code for sour service).
So the question is how to make this flange
option 1- take 16" SCH40 flange cut back reach SCH 60 and then make hub as Fig 7 ASME B16.5, the question is , "Is this approach allowed by code or not?
Option 2: take a self reinforced flange and machined it to required dimension, again the question is : "Is this approach allowed by code or not?
Sorry for long story question , just I thought may be you have had similar situation in past?
Have you had a situation like: to have a thicker wall thickness in flange ending?
for example, consider the 16" flange with ID equal to 16" SCH 40 piping , but need a thicker wall thickness in flange side.
the problem is coming that I have pipeline pipe which is higher grade material like API 5L X52 (SMYS is 52 ksi) but I want to connect this pipe to B16.5 flanges 16" size but SCH 60 because it is A105 (SMYS 36 ksi) , I shall use Fig 1 of ASME B16.5, (internal tapering as Fig 2 ASME B16.5 is not permitted as per Z662 Canadian code for sour service).
So the question is how to make this flange
option 1- take 16" SCH40 flange cut back reach SCH 60 and then make hub as Fig 7 ASME B16.5, the question is , "Is this approach allowed by code or not?
Option 2: take a self reinforced flange and machined it to required dimension, again the question is : "Is this approach allowed by code or not?
Sorry for long story question , just I thought may be you have had similar situation in past?