rkg
Mechanical
- Jul 30, 1999
- 30
Thermal stabilization of stabilized grades of aust. SS(SS347/SS321) and associated welds is increasingly being specified (which means heating to 815-900 deg. C followed by cooling in air).
1.What advantages does stabilization have?
2.Further, what could go wrong in previous installations where SS347/ SS347H was used without stabilization?
3. Can it be said definitively that thermally stabilized piping installations operating at high temperatures would perform better in service than those not subject to this heat treatment.
4. What should be the heating rates and soaking times? Some people/ specifications recommend minimum four hours soaking irrespective of thickness.
5. Is it justified to apply thermal stabilization heat treatment to all applications of SS347/SS321 subject to pressure and temperature? It is to be noted that getting this treatment at Mills costs additional money while buying materials.
1.What advantages does stabilization have?
2.Further, what could go wrong in previous installations where SS347/ SS347H was used without stabilization?
3. Can it be said definitively that thermally stabilized piping installations operating at high temperatures would perform better in service than those not subject to this heat treatment.
4. What should be the heating rates and soaking times? Some people/ specifications recommend minimum four hours soaking irrespective of thickness.
5. Is it justified to apply thermal stabilization heat treatment to all applications of SS347/SS321 subject to pressure and temperature? It is to be noted that getting this treatment at Mills costs additional money while buying materials.