Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
THE BEST LOCATION TO MEASURE CURRENT 1
- Thread starter garciaf
- Start date
The current will be the same at both locations, so in one sense it doesn't matter. Which is the easiest location to fit a current probe / clampmeter? Generally I'd prefer the MCC because it's usually easier to control access to the location if there are exposed live terminals.
- Moderator
- #3
Both good answers.
But in these days of increased awareness of Arc Flash dangers, measuring current in the MCC bucket may come with some added procedural requirements for opening the door when live ("Hot Work Permits), as well as added PPE based on the "incident energy" in the MCC as a whole and the fact that an arc blast could start in some area other than where you are working yet still put you in danger. I've heard it argued that opening the motor terminal box while energized does not present the same risk of arc flash danger. I'm not sure I agree 100%, but I do think it is slightly less risky, depending on how the terminations are made up (i.e. bolted connections fully wrapped or covered).
" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
But in these days of increased awareness of Arc Flash dangers, measuring current in the MCC bucket may come with some added procedural requirements for opening the door when live ("Hot Work Permits), as well as added PPE based on the "incident energy" in the MCC as a whole and the fact that an arc blast could start in some area other than where you are working yet still put you in danger. I've heard it argued that opening the motor terminal box while energized does not present the same risk of arc flash danger. I'm not sure I agree 100%, but I do think it is slightly less risky, depending on how the terminations are made up (i.e. bolted connections fully wrapped or covered).
" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
Technically speaking opening the live terminal box is more dangerous than opening the MCC cable alley. In the cable alley normally you are not directly exposed the shock hazard, as the live terminals are normally shrouded.
When you open the motor terminal box, you are exposing to the shock hazard as well.
Additionally:
Please note that the MCCs are normally located in an environmentally better location than the motor. Will be conditioned and clean, with better clearance for working.
The motor locations are generally not conducive to take the current measurements.
When you open the motor terminal box, you are exposing to the shock hazard as well.
Additionally:
Please note that the MCCs are normally located in an environmentally better location than the motor. Will be conditioned and clean, with better clearance for working.
The motor locations are generally not conducive to take the current measurements.
-
1
- #6
The best practice now is to use “intelligent motor control” devices that can communicate to remote systems and allow you to monitor motor current without ever opening the door of anything. That’s all I specify any more. People whine about the up front cost, but once it’s installed and they realize the time savings of not having to suit up in PPE just to monitor current, change OL settings or check to see if a contactor is closing, they never regret that decision.
" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
" We are all here on earth to help others; what on earth the others are here for I don't know." -- W. H. Auden
- Status
Similar threads
- Question
- Question