Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Symmetry Annotation

Status
Not open for further replies.

BridgeNut

Computer
May 6, 2010
1
Hi,

I'm working on some drawings (making new drawings for reference) for a steel arch bridge built back in 1893, and have some of the original shop drawings.

On some of the drawings only one-half of the part is drawn (up to the Centerline) and noted: "SYM ABT CENTERLINE".

Am I right in assuming this means symmetrical about centerline, if so is this annotation still used today?, if not what else would be used.

Many thanks,

Gord
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I think you are safe in your assumption, it was common in the pre CAD days to have shortcuts like this in drafting practices. I was taught not to use section lines in my early career before we had modern CAD systems. The ASME standard fig. 1-33 shows a method for implying symmetry and I have heard it mentioned here before, but, I have never seen it used on a modern drawing.
 
Hi Bridgenut

Yes your assumption is correct and I have recently seen CAD drawings using the same terms.

desertfox
 
There is a GD&T symbol for symmetry as I recall though I believe it has wider application in ISO rather than ASME.

What you're talking about is subtly different but I think the idea is still shown in the relevant ASME spec whose number escapes me and I'm not at work to look.

Posting guidelines faq731-376 (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
 
I don't think the note is implying any GD&T constraint, simply that only half the bridge is drawn and the undrawn portion is a mirror image of the drawn portion.

My CAD system will make a half view and place 2 parallel lines at either end of a symmetry line per either ISO or ASME. I don't know which specific parts of the standards cover this.
 
dgallup,
Y14.5M-1994 shows what you have described in the figure per my above statement.
Frank
 
Thannks Frank I was thinking Y14.3 but as you say it's in 14.5.

Posting guidelines faq731-376 (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: faq1088-1484
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor