I thought we cannot apply directly the air flashover distances for application over the porcelain surface. One is the non uniformity in the distribution of equipotential lines over the porcelain surface ( ie voltage stress concentration) In a condenser bushing where the voltage lines are made uniform axially, the flashover distance can be much less than in a post insulator. Another is the effect of pollution and humidity over the porcelain surface.40-50 years back it was thought that flashover value under polluted conditions can be maintained by providing more protected ( ie not exposed to rain) creepage over the porcelain ( by providing anti-fog sheds ie deep, under corrugated sheds at close pitches) and specifications were particular to mention that protected creepage length of porcelain shall be more than 50 % of the total creepage length. Later research ( specially by NGK) revealed that this is quite against reality and for better performance under pollution, the protected distance shall be reduced with wide spaced short sheds( and today's spec insist creepage length to be less than 50%) The dry band under the deep sheds were getting wet under humidity and causing discharge and flashover under pollution with first rains. Today's 'easy clean' sheds ( long /short tapering sheds instead of earlier horizontal sheds) allow rains to wash out the deposits thereby avoiding a flashover. These findings were incorporated long back in IEC standards 60071-2, 60815-1,2,3 and CIGRE reports 158 &361 with regard to selection of insulators for polluted environments.
1990's saw the development of RTV (room temperature vulcanizing) silicone coatings (mainly from Canada) which made a quantum jump in pollution performance. Refer CIGRE Reports 442,478.
observations from crshears is quite interesting, something unknown to me. a tropical man. One interesting feature seen in India-only certain areas the seashore salt deposit on porcelain is causing problem while other areas it is not an issue at all.