Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Structural Tubing Telescopic Connection

Status
Not open for further replies.

iv63

Structural
Jan 6, 2009
128
Two pieces of tubular steel sections (round or square or rectangular) are telescopically connected as shown on the attached sketch. How to calculate/determine minimum overlapping length in order to develop full moment capacity of the smaller section?
Thank you,
IV


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

how are the two pieces going to be connected together ?
i'd anticipate bolts; a minimum of two rows would produce a reasonable bending connection.

how tightly do the two pieces fit together ?
obviously, if there is a lot of clearance, the two pieces will act more like a plastic hinge.
 
If a sliding fit, and no fastener except for something to keep the parts together, then I would likely do a quick FE model, complete with air gap. I'm not aware of any empiracle methods.

Dik
 
Just a thought:

1. Calculate Moment capacity of smaller section = SxFb
2. Calculate a couple equal to M/d where d = overlap length
3. Calculate shear strees equal to Couple/Av where Couple equals M/d & Av equals shear area in vertical legs
4. Check shear stress against allowable
5. Recalculate overlap length and repeat until shear stress is less than allowable.

This analysis assumes a tight fit between the pieces.
 
I like steve1's approach. Although it may not have much effect, I would increase "d" by a bearing length, the shear divided by (.9Fy times an assumed bearing width). Question is, what's an appropriate bearing width. For a round tube, I think you can use the smaller tube diameter. For a square or rectangular tube, I'd use 3 times the outside corner radius of the smaller tube.
 
I recommend you check buckling of the thin wall and I would probably cut the value of 'd' in your model in half of the actual overlap length. Look at a free body diagram of one end and it should be clear to you.
 
Using six different HHS sizes (2" to 5.5"),I get a empirical result of: Overlap d = Twice the larger member largest cross section dimension. Seems to work with some flexing, (less than 4 degreees of alignment change at tangent ends).
 
AWD D1.1 has limits on the fit up tolerances for telescoping peices
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor