SolidWorks World Top 10 Ideas

[rstupplebeen]

SWW top 10 ideas is going on again. Basically users submit and vote on their top enhancement requests.

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/brains...d=17&idtoken=887F81E96C22D8D2D28384E9C764B863

Vote for my favorites if you like them.

Create conic sketch entities with a rho value

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/brains...10F43C462C3178F5D782E34C4A80F4&del=0&active=1

Equation driven surface

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/brains...=1640&ptoken=F55C3D640DF4E3E6A9D6BA15A29D2C89

Dimensions in Design Table Can't tell if driven

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/brains...=1643&ptoken=D3B32D8224C37F341CD3DA2B19DC0585

Equation driven curve configurations

http://www.solidworks.com/sw/brains...=1641&ptoken=69C81D54B9232CC49591B6896464E3BC

Rob Stupplebeen

 

[lumenharold]

Conics w/ Rho already done. Next three, done, done and done. Five days of voting to make-up about 90 votes or so but I've done my part!

Harold
SW2010 SP1.0 OPW2010 SP1.0 Win XP Pro 2002 SP3
Dell 690, Xeon 5160 @3.00GHz, 3.25GB RAM
nVidia Quadro FX4600

http://www.lumenflow.com

 

[rstupplebeen]

Harold,
I knew you would be on board. Thanks.


Rob Stupplebeen

 

[mx2street]

I can't wait for "Backwards Compatibility"

Tony Murschel, CSWA
Vista Enterprise x64
Intel E6850-4GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
Inventor 2009

 

[SBaugh]

Thats been on the list for nearly 10 years+ now and its still not made it out yet... don't hold your breathe for back compatiablity... you will probably sufficate if you do.

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

"If it's not broke, Don't fix it!"

faq731-376

 

[mx2street]

Sorry, I forgot my </sarcasm> tag.

I just laughed last year at SWW when the Top 10 included "Backwards Compatibility" and even "Better performance".

The better performance one to me seemed like a no-brainer.

Tony Greising-Murschel, CSWA
Windows XP SP3 x86
Core i7 870 - 4GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
SolidWorks 2010 SP2.0

 

[lumenharold]

Improved Stability is vying for number one right now (seven votes back last I checked). Perhaps rephrasing "Better performance" as "Improved Stability" will do the trick! It doesn't seem that a "given" like stability or improved speed or any other basic software attribute required to be competitive should be on the list but there it is... again.

Perhaps instead of "Backwards Compatibility" it should be "Future Release Interoperability". Then for sure it will happen.

Where's my Thesaurus? Conics,....


Harold
SW2010 SP1.0 OPW2010 SP1.0 Win XP Pro 2002 SP3
Dell 690, Xeon 5160 @3.00GHz, 3.25GB RAM
nVidia Quadro FX4600

http://www.lumenflow.com