mrpid
Structural
- Mar 14, 2008
- 47
This is a question of curiosity more than anything, as any design I would perform would be in accordance with AISC.
In short AISC Table 10-9a provides allowable loads for Single Plate Shear connections, which is simply followed and covers all the modes of failure for this connection type with the exception of a coped beam which needs to be checked as well. Within the description of the table the max "a" dimension is 3".
Now looking at an extended plate connection, the bolt groups needs to be considered with eccentricity equal to "a". The req'd coefficient is covered in Table 7-7. What I find interesting is that with an e=3" has a coefficient less than 1.0 (for a 2-bolt connection).
The question I have when comparing this application with e=3", why is C not equal to 2.0 (for a 2 bolt connection). In this application it seems the extended plate connection is overly conservative.
Any shared knowledge would be appreciated.
In short AISC Table 10-9a provides allowable loads for Single Plate Shear connections, which is simply followed and covers all the modes of failure for this connection type with the exception of a coped beam which needs to be checked as well. Within the description of the table the max "a" dimension is 3".
Now looking at an extended plate connection, the bolt groups needs to be considered with eccentricity equal to "a". The req'd coefficient is covered in Table 7-7. What I find interesting is that with an e=3" has a coefficient less than 1.0 (for a 2-bolt connection).
The question I have when comparing this application with e=3", why is C not equal to 2.0 (for a 2 bolt connection). In this application it seems the extended plate connection is overly conservative.
Any shared knowledge would be appreciated.