Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Scratch on external wall of Pressure Vessel Head 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

azmirosman

Mechanical
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
20
Location
MY
Dear All,

I would like to get assistant on the dented at external pressure vessel head.

During level 2 of structure installation (in Module), the existing pipe support is resting on the top head of the pressure vessel.

Existing pipe support is prewelded at another structure at level 2 and accidentally i believed there was force from the support to the vessel head.

And after remove the pipe support, we performed inspection at clashing area and found that there is some scratch that preliminary measurement of depth is about 0.8 mm to 1.2mm.

We will call AI and vessel fabricator to inspect and provide judgment and solution.

However, before we come to discussion, i would like to know any reference or standard that i can refer regarding requirement of maximum depth of external wall.

From my understanding, i only can find tolerance of roundness in UG-81.But nor able to find any clause that refer to dent and depth for external wall.

Appreciate if anybody can assist.

I attach here picture before and after remove the clash pipe support.

 
Can you tell us actual thickness and required thickness of head?

Regards
 
Hi,

Actual thickness after forming : 25.44 mm
Required thickness : 21.36 mm

Thanks
 
Well.
I suggest:
1) grind flush
2) Liquid penetrant
3) No need to weld to restore thickness.
4) Repair the paint.

Regards
 
yes smoth grind as r6155 says
 
Thank You all for the advice.

This vessel already Hydrotested.

If grind smooth, it is consider hot work that require re-HT?
 
If the vessel is already hydrotested, then this is no longer an issue regarding the Code of Construction. This is a fitness-for-service matter and should be handled as such. The advice provided by r6155 is sound - and no need to re-perform the pressure test.
 
Structural integrity is not affected, so hydrostatic testing is not required.
This repair must be documented, check with the inspector.

Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top