I was wondering if anyone knew why with single phase, we use the constant .707, which is the reciprocal of the square root of 2. And for 3 phase we use the constant 1.732, which is the square root of 3, but not the reciprocal value. I am not a student, btw, doing homework. I've just forgotten. Is 1.732, not the RMS? Or, some other value. I've looked a lot, and cannot find exactly what that number represents.
Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.
Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations dmapguru on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
RMS, AND 1.732 FOR 3 PHASE
- Thread starter denison
- Start date
Skogsgurra
Electrical
There is no connection whatsoever between those two numbers.
The 1/sqrt(2) is to calculate RMS fom sine peak.
The sqrt(3) is relation between V(L-L) and V(L-N).
If you can't find that anywhere, then you can't have been looking very well. It is in all basic text-books. And your teacher must have mentioned it several times.
Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
The 1/sqrt(2) is to calculate RMS fom sine peak.
The sqrt(3) is relation between V(L-L) and V(L-N).
If you can't find that anywhere, then you can't have been looking very well. It is in all basic text-books. And your teacher must have mentioned it several times.
Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
This linked article says it is not hard to understand three-phase if you use a phasor diagram, and then they give one
- Status
Similar threads
- Question
- Question
- Locked
- Question