NADOR123
Structural
- Apr 3, 2007
- 49
Hi every body,
I am reviewing a design of reinforced concrete section to close seven circular opens ( one foot diameter each and one foot apart (edge to edge) . the seven opens are located at the corner of dividing wall between a 22'x 60'tank and 18' x 60'tank with 15' hieght and the seven open are located one foot high from the bottom slab.
The design proposed two 12" section walls (one on each side) 15’ long and 5' high with one layer of rebar (#6 @ 12" vertically embedded 8" to the bottom slab & # 4@12" Horizontally) matching the original reinforcement of the wall to replace rebars that has been cut during the coring of the seven opens.
I am not sure if having 3 feet section of concrete (12" new wall section + 12" of existing wall) 15 long X 5 feet high (height of original wall dowels) is really required
to close the seven holes.
I think that design is ignoring the structural value of 5' high of the existing wall because the dowels through the seven holes were cut. I feel that solution is over-designed.
Is anyone has better idea of closing the holes and keep the wall structurally sound to handle the liquid pressure if one tank is fool and the other side is empty. At the same time I am trying to reduce the cost ($ 21,000).
Thank You for your kind help
I am reviewing a design of reinforced concrete section to close seven circular opens ( one foot diameter each and one foot apart (edge to edge) . the seven opens are located at the corner of dividing wall between a 22'x 60'tank and 18' x 60'tank with 15' hieght and the seven open are located one foot high from the bottom slab.
The design proposed two 12" section walls (one on each side) 15’ long and 5' high with one layer of rebar (#6 @ 12" vertically embedded 8" to the bottom slab & # 4@12" Horizontally) matching the original reinforcement of the wall to replace rebars that has been cut during the coring of the seven opens.
I am not sure if having 3 feet section of concrete (12" new wall section + 12" of existing wall) 15 long X 5 feet high (height of original wall dowels) is really required
to close the seven holes.
I think that design is ignoring the structural value of 5' high of the existing wall because the dowels through the seven holes were cut. I feel that solution is over-designed.
Is anyone has better idea of closing the holes and keep the wall structurally sound to handle the liquid pressure if one tank is fool and the other side is empty. At the same time I am trying to reduce the cost ($ 21,000).
Thank You for your kind help