Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Relief Valve Nameplate Capacity 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

chemter

Chemical
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
25
Location
US
I have a couple related questions concerning relief valve nameplate capacity. I sized a relief valve for nitrogen at relieving conditions of 305°F and 234.7 psia (200 psig + 10% overpressure + 1 atm). Using the API general vapor sizing equation for critical vapor flow, I came up with a rated capacity in lb/hr of nitrogen. The nameplate capacity of the relief valve is given in SCFM of Air at 60°F. If I convert my rated flow of lb/hr nitrogen to SCFM of Air at 60°F, shouldn't they be equal, or very close to equal? This also leads to my second related question. ASME code (Sec. VIII, Div. 1, M-7(a), states that the inlet pressure losses shall be based on the valve nameplate capacity, corrected for the characteristics of the flowing fluid. Is this "correction for the characteristics of the flowing fluid" the value you get when you use the API critical flow vapor sizing equation?
Thank you in advance for your time and help.
 
Accordint to Campbell the conversion between mass flow and std. vol flow (in US units is):

lb/hr=110 (MMscfd)(MW gas).

The mol weight of N2 is 0.028 lb/lbmol so take your flow rate and divide it by 0.028 and 110 and you will have your flow rated in MMscfd.

With regards to the last part: The nameplate capacity may be given for a specific fluid (water/air whatever) - since the actual fluid may be different the losses shall be based on the physical properties of the actual fluid at he relieving conditions (sp+10 %, relieving temperature not std. conditions) etc.

Best regards

Morten
 
MortenA:

What is your source for N2 Molecular weight? Mine shows 28.0134 lb/lb-mole.

Cheers!

MPritchett
 
ah

Im not used to lbmol - and i think you are right. its also 28 kg/kgmol and 28 g/mol - so yes! You must be right :-)

Best regards

Morten
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top