r6155
Now we are getting even more off topic.
pWPS's are applicable for BS/EN/ISO applications.
They are not applicable for ASME IX applications which is clearly what the post is about.
I fail to see how they can be similar if one is a preliminary WPS (pre-PQR) and one is a WPS based on a qualified PQR.
STANDARD WELDING PROCEDURE SPECIFICATIONS (SWPS)
(Excerpt from AWS B2.1/B2.1M:2021)
All SWPSs are supported by procedure qualification records (PQRs) which meet the rules of AWS B2.1 and which in addition are intended to meet the rules of the major codes which govern the intended applications such as .....Section IX.....
The data to support a Standard Welding Procedure Specification are derived from procedure qualification records (PQRs) generated by the B2G Subcommittee on Procedure Qualification Records and PQRs received from industry and government agencies. For all committee generated PQRs, the welding, testing, and evaluation are performed under the direct supervision of the B2G Subcommittee.
The purpose of this policy is to restrict the WPS to a high probability of successful application by all users. In judging the extent of such restriction, the Committee is guided by the number and scope of the supporting PQRs, including the specific material, thickness and value for each welding variable used for the development of the PQR, and by known fabrication experience. The minimum number of supporting PQRs required by the Committee is two but is usually in the range of two to fifty, the specific minimum number being a Committee decision for each WPS. It is the intent of the AWS B2 Committee to have SWPSs only for commonly welded materials and common manual and semiautomatic welding processes.
(Note: PQRs are not available to the purchaser of the SWPSs. The PQRs are deleted after validation)
SWPS's are created by an AWS committee utilising multiple PQR's - your comment that a WPS comes before a PQR is ridiculous.