Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Question about Tie pair definition and boundary conditions

Status
Not open for further replies.

orangi55

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
4
Location
US
For this model I am simulating a simple long-gauge strain sensor mounted on the side of a beam under uniform tension.
The long-gauge sensor is a wire that is attached to L brackets on each end, which are fixed onto the surface of the beam
c22_ujyec8.jpg


I am getting the following error: Too many attempts for this increment (1st increment)
Warnings:
For *tie pair (assembly__pickedsurf247-assembly__pickedsurf246), adjusted nodes with very small adjustments were not printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.

For *tie pair (assembly__pickedsurf248-assembly__pickedsurf220), adjusted nodes with very small adjustments were not printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.

Slave surface assembly__pickedset242_cns_ is a node-based surface used with surface to surface approach. In order to obtain improved stress accuracy with this approach, an element-based surface should be used instead.

Please make sure that the mesh density of the slave surface in the tie pair (assembly__pickedset242_cns_,assembly__pickedsurf241) is finer than the master surface. The analysis may run slower, may yield inaccurate results, and may require more memory if this is not the case.

For *tie pair (assembly__pickedset242_cns_-assembly__pickedsurf241), adjusted nodes with very small adjustments were not printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.

Slave surface assembly__pickedset244_cns_ is a node-based surface used with surface to surface approach. In order to obtain improved stress accuracy with this approach, an element-based surface should be used instead.

Please make sure that the mesh density of the slave surface in the tie pair (assembly__pickedset244_cns_,assembly__pickedsurf243) is finer than the master surface. The analysis may run slower, may yield inaccurate results, and may require more memory if this is not the case.

For *tie pair (assembly__pickedset244_cns_-assembly__pickedsurf243), adjusted nodes with very small adjustments were not printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 1 of 2 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_1_1_1_1_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 2 of 9 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_2_1_1_1_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 1 of 2 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_1_1_1_2_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 1 of 4 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_1_1_1_3_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 3 of 1 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_3_1_1_3_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 1 of 6 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_1_1_1_4_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 3 of 4 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_3_1_1_4_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 1 of 8 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_1_1_1_5_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 2 of 5 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_2_1_1_5_1.

Solver problem. Zero pivot when processing D.O.F. 3 of 8 nodes. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeSolvProbZeroPiv_3_1_1_5_1.
=================================================================================

I have a feeling that this all has to do with the way the sensor and the L brackets are attached.
Right now I have the following interactions between my instances:

tie: wire fixed to the L brackets by tying the end node of the wire to the surface of the L bracket
tie: L bracket surface tied to the side surface of the beam.

I have been trying to adjust different things but nothing has worked so far, always the same set of warnings.
Have I missed something very obvious or?
Any advice would be super helpful! Thanks in advance!
 
I didn't read the post very carefully (sorry) but, with a cursory look, it seems like you are overconstraining some DOFs at some nodes. Pay attention to nodes where you are specifying both kinematic constraints AND boundary conditions.

*********************************************************
Are you new to this forum? If so, please read these FAQs:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top