I think you might want to rephrase that 'poorly designed' comment.... as YOU stated:
boubacar (Chemical) 11 Feb 05 15:48
We are using those parts since 2001. Furthermore we have 4 pumps using them, but we have faillure only on one of them ( 2 shafts broken in 3 weeks). This later has commun suction and cummun discharge with another one, which experienced no problem.
How can I blame the part?
It appears 3 pumps are running fine. Perhaps your System, not the pump, is the 'poorly designed' culprit.
Any pump (or other equipment) is selected based on customer supplied parameters (head, flow, npsha, etc.) which may change over time due to production requirements, etc. It's incumbent on the the system manager or process engineer (like You) to understand both the original criteria and the current conditions so that either the pumps or the system can be updated to accomodate the new values.
I think just blaming GIW for this seems a bit short-sighted on your part. I looked at their website (
) and they've been doing this for over 100 years. Perhaps when this pump was originally installed, it met the system requirements. Or perhaps your previous systems engineer supplied the wrong information.
Remember, you're making these comments to an International Forum of folks who work in design and engineering...
As I stated earlier - Fix the PROBLEM, not the blame.
Keep us posted on how the issue is resolved, ok?
Keep the wheels on the ground
Bob