I respectfully disagree. There are cases where a short suction line can cause problems. A pump can cavitate from inadequate suction head, as previously noted. But, it can also cavitate from suction recirculation or discharge recirculation. Throwing turbulence into the suction of an end suction pump can change the flow rate at which it will experience suction recirculation cavitation. The preferred arrangement is to have 10 straight pipe diameters before the first reducer, valve or elbow. But, this is hard to justify in most applications. I would still fight to try and get 5 straight pipe diameters if possible. It is very common to put a reducer right at the suction flange. And common practice calls for an eccentric reducer, flat on top to avoid a vapor pocket trap. But, if the first elbow upstream turns the pipe in the vertical direction, it will be self-venting even if the reducer is concentric. I prefer a concentric reducer in this circumstance. I expect a number of people might step up to disagree with me. Smooth, stable, flow with as little turbulence as possible is desirable for good operation with no cavitation.
All I have to do is look around my plant for pumps that consistently have high vibration and poor reliability. A lot of them are piped up on the suction with an eccentric reducer directly to an elbow turning the line to the vertical with a block valve in the vertical leg. This takes up the least space and uses the least fittings. But it does not provide the ideal flow to the pump suction. For some pumps it might not make any difference. But, if you have a pump with a high suction specific speed, or if you have to run the pump well below best efficiency point flow, you may have problems that would not exist with a longer straight run of pipe on the suction.
Johnny Pellin