jonelv
Mechanical
- Jan 26, 2004
- 14
Hello
I'm looking at a design where I'm pumping from approx ground level (say 0m), over a pipebridge (7m elevation) to a vessel (1m) which is open to the atmosphere. The downhill part of the pipeline is a near vertical drop. My thoughts are to treat the headloss design for the pump duty point as for a total head of friction loss plus 1 m of static but to ensure that the pump can generate a closed valve head at least 7m + friction to ensure the system will prime when the pipe is empty.
My intention is to fit an air valve at the high point to remove air on filling but not to admit air. My question - can I assume that I will get the full benefit of the syphon effect caused by the downhill section or would the fluid acceleration as it drops down the pipe cause me vaccuum / column separation problems. Should I therefore select a duty point based on the high point static head?
Cheers
Jone
I'm looking at a design where I'm pumping from approx ground level (say 0m), over a pipebridge (7m elevation) to a vessel (1m) which is open to the atmosphere. The downhill part of the pipeline is a near vertical drop. My thoughts are to treat the headloss design for the pump duty point as for a total head of friction loss plus 1 m of static but to ensure that the pump can generate a closed valve head at least 7m + friction to ensure the system will prime when the pipe is empty.
My intention is to fit an air valve at the high point to remove air on filling but not to admit air. My question - can I assume that I will get the full benefit of the syphon effect caused by the downhill section or would the fluid acceleration as it drops down the pipe cause me vaccuum / column separation problems. Should I therefore select a duty point based on the high point static head?
Cheers
Jone