Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pro/E i7 vs higher clock rate C2d

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2ms1
  • Start date Start date
2

2ms1

Guest
I'm about to get a new computer at work. I am somewhat
tempted to get one with an i7 processor because the i7s
absolutely kill Core2Duos in 3D rendering.

However, most of my work is just in Pro/E, and the i7s
(in computers my work will get me ie Dell, HP) are quad-
core with much lower clock rates than the C2Ds available.

So I have a dilema: Do I go for higher clock rate or do
I go for more cores and memory bandwidth.

Does Pro/E utilize additional cores much at all during
general modeling? I am concerned that if it doesn't,
then perhaps it would actually run faster on a
cheaper 3.06Ghz C2D than it would on a quad-core 2.26 GHz
i7.

Any advice on this would be very much appreciated. If a
quad 2.26-2.4 GHz i7 would be about the same speed as a
3.06 GHZ C2D, then I think it would still be worth
getting an i7 for the rendering performance. However, if
such an i7 might actually be slower then it would be a
waste of money.
Edited by: 2ms1
 
To my knowledge, Pro/E is only multi-threaded in assembly retrieval.
 
Does that mean regeneration of assemblies would be faster?
Or does that only mean that opening up assembly files would
be faster?

Is there anything that a lower clock-rate i7 might be
faster than a C2D at then?
 
In Our Experience it's faster at everything, as long as you have the triple channel high clock ram to go with it.

We have two I7 systems...
 
Thanks for the feedback. Then I think I'm gonna go with
one of the Xeon W3520 (2.66GHz) processors in maybe a
Lenovo S20 workstation. The Nehalems kill C2Ds in
Hypershot benchmarks (extreme memory bandwidth intensive
and multi-threaded). If they're also faster in Pro/E then
they're worth the money to me.

Now I just need to select the graphics hardware.
 
I'm running two dual-core Xeons with WF4, on WinXP Pro. I've only ever seen Pro/E max out at 25% - one core's worth of processing power.
 
You also need to think how long you will be stuck with the
box. PTC have stated that ProE WILL get more multithreaded
with time - hopefully within our lifetime :)

If you use Mechanica there is some advantage - and there is
the opportunity to multi-task your work as well - do two
things at once - although this is apparently only possible
for women :)
Edited by: moriarty
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top