utilengr
Civil/Environmental
- Aug 20, 2010
- 12
We are looking to replace old chart recorders with newer equipment also capable of capturing pressure spikes/water hammer. There are a couple that we've been looking at:
1) ITT Unit: 2) Telog Unit:
There are 2 key differences
1) Price
2) Sampling rate - The ITT unit can capture 10 samples/sec, while the much more expensive Telog Unit can capture 20 samples/sec.
I've been trying to determine if the additional sampling rate is needed to be able to get useful information from the unit associated with pressure spikes. Both advertise the same ability to capture pressure spikes. Could a peak be missed if only sampling at a 10th of second rate? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated - as well as any feedback on these particular units (or others) if there is direct experience with either/both.
1) ITT Unit: 2) Telog Unit:
There are 2 key differences
1) Price
2) Sampling rate - The ITT unit can capture 10 samples/sec, while the much more expensive Telog Unit can capture 20 samples/sec.
I've been trying to determine if the additional sampling rate is needed to be able to get useful information from the unit associated with pressure spikes. Both advertise the same ability to capture pressure spikes. Could a peak be missed if only sampling at a 10th of second rate? Any thoughts on this would be appreciated - as well as any feedback on these particular units (or others) if there is direct experience with either/both.