No, I meant the engine manufacturers.
The booster module suppliers do not tend to have/need this information.
They usually rely on using only equipment certified (by the certification agencies) and approved (by the engine manufacturers).
However, you would expect the engine manufacturers to have this data and it's where I first acquired it some 10-12 years ago (and since lost it).
Of course, you could try any of the manufacturers of equipment for the fuel circuit, no point in passing the testing only to have the sensor fail due to hydraulic pulsations.
Or maybe the manufacturers of the injectors.
Pressure pulsations used to be a problem with mass meters (and may still be at these levels for some manufacturers) but generally sensors or equipment not containing pressure in the measuring/critical elements are mostly not directly affected. The effect of the vibrations produced ought to be covered by the class testing.
Getting engine manufacturer approvals involved 8000hrs continuous operation testing for the sensor I worked on. Any problems should show up in those tests (and tended to do so) and get identified and fixed. (And did not necessarily mean a restart of the trial).
JMW