etrobal
Mechanical
- May 27, 2008
- 39
we need to install (asap!) a tee connection. however, the tee welds will require pwht (as the thickness is 25.4mm) but we don't have the time as the plant shutdown cannot be extended.
what we did is that we tapered the ends of the tee connection (three ends) to a thickness where pwht will not be needed and proceeded with the weld connection. needless to say, we did not do any pwht on the three welds.
is the tapering of the thickness to forego the pwht allowed? with the tapered butt ends of the tee, the heat affected zone (haz) is thus reduced to a thickness where pwht is no longer needed. am i correct on this haz?
the resulting tapered thickness was 12.5mm or half an inch while the length of the taper from all butt ends was approximately 50mm.
is there a code or a standard that says so? is this good engineering practice? what might be the consequences of our action?
our design pressure is 2.14 mpag while design temperature is 216degC. the tee size is 30-inch diameter with a wall thickness of 25.4mm.
what we did is that we tapered the ends of the tee connection (three ends) to a thickness where pwht will not be needed and proceeded with the weld connection. needless to say, we did not do any pwht on the three welds.
is the tapering of the thickness to forego the pwht allowed? with the tapered butt ends of the tee, the heat affected zone (haz) is thus reduced to a thickness where pwht is no longer needed. am i correct on this haz?
the resulting tapered thickness was 12.5mm or half an inch while the length of the taper from all butt ends was approximately 50mm.
is there a code or a standard that says so? is this good engineering practice? what might be the consequences of our action?
our design pressure is 2.14 mpag while design temperature is 216degC. the tee size is 30-inch diameter with a wall thickness of 25.4mm.