NZMark
Mechanical
- Nov 1, 2008
- 32
Dear All,
I am placing a set of adjustable parts in an assembly.
Certain parts will be replaced later with others, such that associative placements using existing part *surfaces* become invalid.
Fortunately, in my case, I can also use reference planes in the parts to perform the initial associative placements, and if I replace these parts with others having the same named planes (x,y,z and some manually added coincidence/parallel ones) then everything works fine.
Except... when I have adjustable parts, the coincidence/parallel planes don't adjust to the adjustable value used in each instance in the assembly (see attached graphic)
Instead, the planes appear in the assembly parts at the position corresponding to the "prototype" part (with a nominal adjustable dimension), not where I hoped for.
I have tried the following, in vain:
1. Parallel vs coincidence - both fail
2. Set position of par./coinc. plane in part using a variable: This also fails, even if I make the plane position variable Adjustable as well and set it manually in the assembly.
I have some reasons why I want to stick with Adjustable parts, as opposed to a Part Family...
Any suggestions?!
Kind regards,
MT
I am placing a set of adjustable parts in an assembly.
Certain parts will be replaced later with others, such that associative placements using existing part *surfaces* become invalid.
Fortunately, in my case, I can also use reference planes in the parts to perform the initial associative placements, and if I replace these parts with others having the same named planes (x,y,z and some manually added coincidence/parallel ones) then everything works fine.
Except... when I have adjustable parts, the coincidence/parallel planes don't adjust to the adjustable value used in each instance in the assembly (see attached graphic)
Instead, the planes appear in the assembly parts at the position corresponding to the "prototype" part (with a nominal adjustable dimension), not where I hoped for.
I have tried the following, in vain:
1. Parallel vs coincidence - both fail
2. Set position of par./coinc. plane in part using a variable: This also fails, even if I make the plane position variable Adjustable as well and set it manually in the assembly.
I have some reasons why I want to stick with Adjustable parts, as opposed to a Part Family...
Any suggestions?!
Kind regards,
MT