I do not typically design rather specialized large diameter steel pipe on support systems; however, I believe in some cases (particularly of some large diameter sizes) there may be more than one way to approach such designs. e.g. if a certain thickness of steel pipe (let's say chosen as a minimum due to handling/availability, suitable for internal pressure etc.) does not result in excessive deflection, maximum localized stresses, mid-span deflection and will not buckle due to vacuum or other external loading etc. with conventional saddle or roller supports, then there would appear to be no need for the (in that case perhaps some extra) expense of and design time/effort ring girder reinforcement. There are of course even other types of localized bearing or stress reinforcement such as "wrapper plates" , around all or part (like a "shoe") of the pipe circumference etc. On the other hand, if say the size, chosen thickness for internal pressure/minimum availability, and span/loadings on the system result in too high localized stresses or buckling tendency at the supports etc., it could be argued ring girder or wrapper plate reinforcement at the supports might optimize some designs in engineering economic terms (as opposed to say otherwise thickening the entire pipeline just due to localized stress etc. concern at the supports). I do however also believe design and fabrication of systems with these localized reinforcements can probably get quite complex in their own right, and the cost of this complexity may need to somehow be factored into the process.
Hopefully you will get response from some actually experienced in optimizing such designs.