Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Perform 3D 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

s_saranya

Civil/Environmental
Oct 23, 2020
59
How to distribute the mass of structural wall to the nodes in perform 3D?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Personally, I prefer to use more of a "lumped mass" model where I lump the mass at each major floor level. I feel like that is an easier / cleaner way to analyze a large structure.

If we're interested in local vibration in areas (like for machinery or such) then using self weight of elements along the height of the wall makes sense. But, when we're talking about the main lateral force resisting system for earthquake analysis, I feel like letting the mass distribute out only increases the analysis complexity without adding much accuracy.

Others may have different preferences, but this is mine.
 
"increases the analysis complexity without adding much accuracy" ... yeah, I think we do that a lot these days.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
One of my first assignments as a structural engineer was to do a dynamic analysis of a nuclear plant building. My model consisted of 4 sticks and 4 masses. Years later someone did an analysis with ANSYS with 10's of thousands of solid elements. Global results were pretty much the same. It's amazing how many nuclear plants were designed in the early days with simple stick models.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor