struct_eeyore
Structural
- Feb 21, 2017
- 264
For those of you who are familiar with this TEK... Link here
I'm a bit embarrassed to say this, but I cannot for the life of me confirm the values in the tables for the closer spaced bar conditions.
For example, if I take the 8" o.c. #8 centered in cells, I get a masonry stress controlling condition that's about 12000 in-lb/ft less than the table (3.a)
For the fully grouted condition I treating each 8" cell as a rectangular beam, and calculating masonry moment with (Fb/2)(jkbd^2).
If I work the provided moments backwards thru this formula, I get Fb = 1718 (~ f'm 3800!).
What am I doing wrong here? Were these tables calculated using strength design, and reduced backwards into ASD? Can the discrepancy be this large?
I'm a bit embarrassed to say this, but I cannot for the life of me confirm the values in the tables for the closer spaced bar conditions.
For example, if I take the 8" o.c. #8 centered in cells, I get a masonry stress controlling condition that's about 12000 in-lb/ft less than the table (3.a)
For the fully grouted condition I treating each 8" cell as a rectangular beam, and calculating masonry moment with (Fb/2)(jkbd^2).
If I work the provided moments backwards thru this formula, I get Fb = 1718 (~ f'm 3800!).
What am I doing wrong here? Were these tables calculated using strength design, and reduced backwards into ASD? Can the discrepancy be this large?