I ubderstand your problem, but I am not sure as to why you think you need to correlate the two design elevations (real world) to the datum? If the same monument is used, regardless of whether NAD28 or NAD84 is used, the elevation on the card is correct. It the design elevations were referenced off this monument, that information must be assumed as correct.
If the marker was re-established, then, again, the new elevation is to be assumed as correct. As a point of record, you may want to determine the disturbance difference.
I have had to convert designs that for reason unknown, the engineer referenced all datum to the plane as opposed to real ground. It was a nightmare to correct and adjust everything to real ground, particularly for the coordinates.
To assist you, I suggest the following:
1) Get your surveyor to tie-in the monument to the boudary of your project and the development. The purpose will be to provide the real-ground co-ordinates to the monument and some common tie references. The elevations will also recorded by the surveyor.
2) Compare the (real ground) elevations of the consultant's drawings, paying particular attention to the elevations of the monuments. They should match. If they do not, the monument may have been disturbed and therefore the most recent elevation (new datum) will have to be used. This elevation does not change with respect to the plane (use of factors), only the co-ordinates change, therefore the datum adjustment on the drawing will only affect the marker, not the design because all other elevations (relative to grades and the sites) were relative to the datum elevation, and since they have not changed, the information will still be valid.
3) Call me if you need further explanation or assistance.
KRS Services