Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Monorail Splice

Status
Not open for further replies.

dik

Structural
Joined
Apr 13, 2001
Messages
26,129
Location
CA
Looking at using a splice similar as shown to an S24 section. It is not intended to weld the S Sections, only to bolt them. The gap is approx 1/8". The monorail will only be used a few times. I intend to align the section and use slip critical fasteners in the splice. Max load is approx 35K.

Dik
 
I've not seen a monorail spliced this way before, but I see no reaon why it will not work (assuming bolts are sized correctly)
I offer that the 1/8" gap may be a problem for the trolley wheels to roll over. We often weld across the top of bottom flange at the joint and grind it smooth. I have seen several occasions where even paint on a rail or lower flange will inhibit trolley wheel rolling.
 
I can try a small weld and grind it smooth... It can be disassembled/broken when the work is done. It's just temporary and I didn't want a 300' long continuous beam, and I didn't want a CJP weld as was originally spec'd. Bolts are overkill... more to retain some rigidity at the joint.

Dik
 
Dik:
It seems to me that we have discussed this project before, you’re moving some heavy equipment in a tunnel or a mine, with tight headroom, or some such, right? I would not cope the one beam end, since that tends to hurt the support of the bottom flange. Why not just use a heavy web plate, welded to one beam end (web) and bolted to the other beam web. Maybe weld a heavy backer plate to the opp. side of web on second beam, then drill/punch the web and backer pl. for the bolted connection. This might also allow you to tighten up the joint gap. The problem with these joints is the differential deflections of the flange tips as the trolley wheels move over the joint gap, and load one flange tip and then try to climb to the other. They actually roll some S shaped (narrower sloped bot. flgs.) Tee sections with thicker flanges and webs to improve this tip deflection problem. A trolley with three axles (six whls.) would be an improvement too; in that more of the load would be further back on the first beam as the leading whl. crossed the slice gap. Are you using off-the-shelf trolleys or are you designing and building your own? Sometimes this gives you some latitude in what you can design around. Also, why not just a WF built-up shape for the hanger with the first (middle) vert. bolts closer to the beam joint. Wouldn’t this reduce the differential deflection btwn. the two beams and through the hanger?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top