DickRussell and rbcoulter:
I apologize profusely for the confusion created by the contradiction re. the J-T coefficient in my earlier posts.
Unfortunately, there is a “Joule-Thompson inversion curve” for every substance: On a P-T diagram, lines of constant enthalpy above this curve have a negative slope, and a positive slope below this curve. Further, this phenomenon can be exhibited both below and above the critical temperature. At very low temperatures and above the saturation pressure, the slope becomes consistently negative.
However, for sub-critical temperatures and at pressures below the saturation curve, the slope is positive (“normal” condition). Thus, T goes down as P is reduced at constant enthalpy for such “normal” vapors. For compressed liquids above the saturation line, at very low temperatures, the J-T slope is consistently negative. However, closer to the critical point, it can become positive for liquids and then reverse sign at higher pressures.
A good description of these phenomena can be found in K.E. Bett, J.S. Rowlinson, and G. Saville: “Thermodynamics for Chemical Engineers” (MIT Press, 1975).
To check the points made above, using the SRK EOS, I ran a simple series of isenthalpic flashes for compressed liquid methane, starting each case at 500 kg/cm2 and -125 C before the valve:
END P [kg/cm2] = 450. 400. 350. 300. 250. 200. 150. 100. 50. 40. 30. 20. 10. 5. 2. 1.
END T [C] = -122.9 –120.8 –118.9 –117.2 –115.6 -114.4 -113.4 –113.0 –113.3 –113.5 –113.8 –114.1 –124.6 –138.0 –152.5 –164.4
It is clear that temperature increases until the pressure drops to about 100 kg/cm2. Hence, the J-T coefficient is negative up to this pressure. After this point, however, the temperature begins to decrease, at first slowly and then far more rapidly; the J-T coefficient has clearly switched sign to become positive. This behavior is entirely consistent with Bett et al’s description.
This pattern of behavior has been exhibited by all hydrocarbons and organic liquids that I have tested. Hydrogen and helium are the main exceptions (based on the special equations of state on the NIST website).
If anyone has found a case where the description provided above has NOT been observed, it would be extremely interesting to study it.