I like to start very simple, just the use of the proper tool for the job.
I saw this approach being used by an international firm in hiring new technicians. We had a female accounting clerk who applied for a job with this company for a job as a technician. She and I had built several Heathkits and while doing so I had taught her the proper use of each tool.
In her aptitude test she was asked to replace a small motor in a piece of equipment. On the table were several tools including a small screwdriver. To get to the motor she was required to take off a cover held by several large screws. She looked at the screws and the available screw driver and without hesitation see opened the tool kit and retrieved the proper screw driver for the subject screw. At this point the tester told her she had the job.
After this incident I convinced our maintenance superintendent that this would be a good approach for future mechanics trainees instead of the current on the job evaluations. Our resultant program including several different tool scenarios, the screw driver, box end wrench vs the open end or adjustable wrench on a rounded nut, etc.
The second stage testing after there was a short exposure to some safety rules, like anything over 12 volts get an electrician, when in doubt get the manual, etc.
The third stage was for people who professed some proficiency in certain areas. For the ones who said hydraulics, there was a valve body where one was ask to change out a cartridge valve. The valve body was extremely dirty. Part of the test was to see if the first step was to clean the area where the valve was to changed.
None of the initial testing was to see if they could do a specific task rather if they had the basic understanding along with the proper approach to a job like the use of tools, safety, instructions, etc.
Anecdotal
The person mentioned above went rapidly up through the ranks and retired from upper management.