Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Line Loss vs. Transmission Voltage 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

jay165

Mechanical
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
178
Location
US
Is there a general equation (empirical, theoretical or rule of thumb) that relates power loss and transmission voltage?

My specific problem: I want to transmit 15 MW approximately 2 miles via a subsea cable. Should I use step up transformers to go from say, 4.16 to 13.8 kV or transmit at 4.16 and accept the higher (if any) losses?

Just looking for some guidelines - I'm not an EE.
 
While any voltage drop can be accomodated with a proper tap setting, I am more concerned with amount of power you are trying to wheel.

Your primary aim should be to minimize the number of cables under the sea. You don't wanna go too ofern under sea to fix a cable problem:)

At 4.16 kV, 15MW=18MVA= 2500 amps (this could be 4 or 5 cables per phase, x 3 = 12 to 15 cables)
At 13.8 kV= 753 Amps (say 2 cables per phase = 6 cables)
At 35 kV =296A. (1 cables per phase = 3 cables).

Of course you have to evlauate this against the cost of the transfromers. I would go with a single cable at higher voltage. Anything on land is easily monitored and attended to.



 
The higher the voltage the smaller the cable.
 
power loss = I^2R = Vdrop^2 / R
 

You will probably need two 3-phase cables for reliability purposes, rather than one cable.

Another factor to consider will be the loading pattern of the cable and the resultant losses. The cost of losses will then determine the most economical voltage level and conductor size. This is not a difficult study but it's best done by an EE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top