Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Limitations of the equivalent lateral force procedure (ASCE7 &EC8) 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ahmed A. Alamin

Structural
Joined
Oct 28, 2019
Messages
32
Location
SD
Hi, i'm kindda new to ASCE7, i was wondering what are the limitations of ELF procedure, i.e when not to use it. In EC8, it is stated that only in case of vertical irregularity you shouldn't use the simplified lateral force method. Honestly, i'm not fully convinced with this, so i started looking for similar clauses in other standrds. Can anyone help me? Or explain to me why Eurocode 8 allowed this?
 
image_eedttz.png
 
The ELF method in ASCE-7 is based on the assumption that a single flexural mode controls the seismic response in each direction. Therefore, anything that would make this assumption invalid means that the ELF method is invalid.

Horizontal irregularities described in table 12.3-1: Generally speaking these irregularities mean that torsion becomes a big enough deal that the ELF assumption isn't valid.

Vertical Irregularities of table 12.3-2: These are mass and stiffness irregularities that would suggest more than one flexural mode would not adequately capture the dynamic response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top