Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Lilium down the gurgler

GregLocock

Automotive
Apr 10, 2001
23,301
old thread


New news

 
Analogous to Reason's swiss cheese model: for a project to be truly successful - from concept through first flight through to production and market acceptance- there are many holes in the swiss cheese which require concentricity.
I am doubtful of the technical integrity of most urban air mobility projects, one only need look at the configuration and detail design.
Of those that are more convincing, the operating economics, market demand, and societal acceptance are big question marks.
 
Google translation, not too sure if the link will work (you need to select german not French!)



pretty damning stuff, and no real surprise. When has anyone ever said 'we want lots of tiny ducted fans'?
 
Google translation, not too sure if the link will work (you need to select german not French!)



pretty damning stuff, and no real surprise. When has anyone ever said 'we want lots of tiny ducted fans'?
The Chrome browser asks if I want it to be in English.
1730163754865.png
 
Yes I'm using Opera for random reasons!
 
Effect of ducted fan diameter on ducted fan performance a graph
 
bad ideas tend to have a common fate. all of these "air taxis" are just awful, IMHO. Most are trying to do the most energy dense operation (VTOL) with the least effective fuel/drivetrain. sigh

I wonder how well "gurgler" translates ? (I understand it, but I wonder about those who are ESC ... English as a Second Culture)

Then there's this "gem" ...100232_0d8a9665edit_312721.jpg
 
Last edited:
Then there's this "gem" ...
That's a boatload of propellers for someone to walk into; if it's not safe as a prototype, it would have needed to be redesigned from the ground up to be safe, and thereby nullifying any certs and qualifications.
 
People walk into propellers already; they get sucked into turbojet engines as well.
 
3DDave... Have You ever investigated a GA prop-Acft or a helo crash? Rotating blades are punishing.

After years

BUT YEAH significant numbers of props/motors are individually and collectively high maintenance and increase the chances for multiple/cascading failure combinations and asymmetries and a host of other negative factors.

Bird strikes, lightning strikes, dust/rock/ramp-FOD, snow, rain, slush, static charge build, FOD etc... to name a few.

This photo... was of a helo that landed safely after a lightning strike on it's 4-bladed helo tail rotor... think about it...

4-Bladed Rotay Rudder after a lightning Strike.jpg

"If it's not there, it costs nothing, weighs nothing and is 100% reliable.” –POPS, forum member, homebuiltairplanes.com
 
Last edited:
Not sure what need there is to investigate - it's not a requirement to shield people from propellers.
 
3DD... all...

Look closely at the photo.

It is of a 4-bladed tail rotor after a lightning strike... which simultaneously failed ['liberated'] 2-opposing blades... and the aircraft flew to a safe landing on these 2-remaining blades... unknown to the crew.

Miraculously the 2-separated blades did not collide with the main rotor blades... nor the aft side of the forward fuselage or landing gear... which, alone could have caused devastating damage.
 
I saw that. Definitely a freak event, unless somehow the design ensured or promoted such a blade shedding mode.:unsure:
 
I was referring to investigating a multi-rotor aircraft designs to keep people from walking into propellers, not the particular accident.

As to the loss of opposing 2 of 4 blades, that cannot realistically be a design point, particularly in departure direction. If such things were then the many crashes due to ordinary use failures of tail rotors would never happen, having been so thoroughly analyzed.

I do have some interest in aviation accidents; I would not say I investigate them, but I read the investigation reports and pay close attention to reliable data.
 
yeah, but Will means investigating why the tail rotor blade exploded in the first place, and why did the second blade fortunately depart.

Thee was a Mayday episode about a helicopter struck by lightning (in the tail rotor as I remember) over the North Sea, Luckily everyone got out ok. There was 1 guy in the CAA (maybe, or in industry) who felt that this event showed that the lightning standards were way too low ... but the combined voice of the CAA and the FAA ruled the day. In twenty plus years we might see who was right (given the amount of composite primary structure there is these days) ?
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor