Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Is this the right way to calculate volume fraction? 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

tugni925

Mechanical
Sep 14, 2020
107
I exploit the symmetry of fig.1 to simplify it to fig.2. This figure has a volume fraction of 0.2, and I need to find a relation between t and L. Have I done it right?


Volume of cube in the middle: (L-2*t)^3

And 4 rectangular plates around the cube in the middle: t*(L-2*t)^2

Volume of fig 2 is then: L^3 – ((L-2*t)^3 + t*(L-2*t)^2)

So volume fraction is that volume divided by the unit cell cube volume, giving:

(L^3 – ((L-2*t)^3 + t*(L-2*t)^2))/L^3 = 0.2

Which gives the relation:

t = 0.0428787 L

1_evlnb2.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Figure 2 is not a unit cell, in that you cannot stack those next to each other to produce figure 1.

The corners of the unit cell are in the center of where the rods intersect.

Also, your last equation cannot be close to correct because the relationship between t and L is not a constant. L and t can be any two numbers, as long as L>2t.
 
He's given a fixed volume fraction, though. Nevertheless, the final equation is wrong for another reason, namely, the numerator should only contain the volume associated with the beams. Something like below. There are 12 beams and 8 corner cubes

vol_sqr2ls.png




TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
"(L.2t)" should be (L-2t)

L is CL to CL and t is the width of an arm, and the arms are in the edges of the cube, then the empty central cube is (L-t)^3 ... t = 2*(t/2)
and there are 6 side (face) voids (L-t)^2*(t/2) ...
(L-t)^3+6*((L-t)^2*(t/2)) = 0.8*L^3
(L-t)^2*((L-t)+3t) = 0.8*L^3 or
(1-(t/L))^2*(1+2*(t/L)) = 0.8
t/L = 0.287141
(if an arm is 2t wide, then t = 0.14357

or the filled space is 20% ...
4*L*(t/2)^2 + 8*(L-t)*(t/2)^2 = 0.2*L^3
(t/L)^2 *(1+2*(1-(t/L))) = 0.2

if the arms are central to the cube (but then there's on "central void") ...
3*L*t^2 - 2*t^3 = 0.2*L^3
3(t/L)^2 -2(t/L)^3 = 0.2
huh!, exactly the same ...


another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
so you're defining the arms as 2t wide ?
OP's sketch defines as "t" wide.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
ok, but you can see the confusion.

for my money the interesting thing was modelling as a central stiffener gave the same result and a simple neat expression ...
3(t/L)^2 -2(t/L)^3 = 0.2

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
Actually, the OP's image shows his "unit cell," wherein I presumed that the "t" was one-half of the thickness of the beams in the full-up structure, so I was simply following his lead.

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
yeah, but he shows the width of a leg being "t".

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
to the OP ...

"Volume of cube in the middle: (L-2*t)^3" ... no, if L is CL to CL then it's L-2(*(t/2) = (L-t)^3

"And 4" ... no, there are 6 (one at each face of the cube) ...
"rectangular plates around the cube in the middle: t*(L-2*t)^2" ... no, t/2*(L-t)^2

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?
 
The unit cell would have the legs "t" being half the width of the full structure's, I think, since one would slice the structure right down middle of the width of each full sized leg

TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor