Sorry, if I came off a bit snooty. I was not trying to be obnoxious. I was just addressing a finer point for those who might read this thread, get confused and be disappointed in results if they went off and used a real "screen dump". Sometimes people latch on to a "keyword" or phrase and it misleads them depending on how it is used. Having done a lot of training, tech. support and demo-jock work in the past, I have learned the hard way to try to be carefully about that.
I think I understand what you want, Roller1. You just want a quick picture of the graphics area of the screen in a PDF? I assume resolution was never really an issue one way or the other for you.
BTW: One more point for those that do want to use screen dump JPEGs (or TIFFs, etc.) for quick pictures - they do have their uses. The appearance of the JPEG when viewed in another application is virtually never as good as the screen was in SW, even though it is the same resolution as your screen. Strange but true. Things are a lot more jaggey looky. Also small stuff like fine text is much more granulated and usually unreadable. Line weights are variable depending on the number of pixels they needed at the screen scale when it weas created (pixels are in integer numbers!!!). This appears to be common to other applications as well as SW. I guess some of it has a lot to do with the fact that JPEG (well, any screen dump) saves don't address anti-aliasing and so on.
John Richards Sr. Mech. Engr.
Rockwell Collins Flight Dynamics
A hobbit's lifestyle sounds rather pleasant...... it's the hairy feet that turn me off.