Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IRC Foundation Design?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SteelPE

Structural
Mar 9, 2006
2,759
I am in the process of designing a residential garage that will have vehicles on two levels (suspended floor and slab on grade). Code is IBC/IRC.

My current wall height is approximately 9’-6”. I am having a crisis in terms of trying to design the foundation wall. The client is OK with waiting to backfill until the floor is in place. So, we now have a propped wall case in terms of wall design.

I have always been taught to use 70*(the height of the wall) for the pressures acting in this instance. When I calculate the wall pressures this way, I end up with quite the lateral force at the base of the wall. My crisis comes from the pressure. I need quite a substantial footing to resist these loads. However, when I sift through IRC, all it appears I need is a 2’-0” wide footing (table R403.1) at the base of the wall with little to no reinforcing in the wall (table R404.1.2(8)) assuming a 12” thick wall.

What gives?

I am now torn between the two and will more than likely settle for something in-between. I am guessing my pressure of 70*h is just a bit too much.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I seem to recall (though I could be wrong) that the IRC also requires a minimum 3.5" thick concrete slab to be poured between the walls at the base - this is what resists the sliding force. The reinforcement in the wall (or lack of) is a whole other issue.
 
I think your soil pressure is too high. I assume you are going to have clean backfill, for which the friction angle Ø = 30° to 35°, and Ko = 1 - sinØ. For a backfill with Ø = 33°, ϒ = 120 pcf, p = (1-sin(33°))*120 = 55 psf - 12.5% less than 70 psf. Also, do you assume uniform pressure over the entire height of the wall? It is another unnecessary conservativism, should use triangle distribution.
 
retired13,

I tank a triangular distribution on the wall however, I do add a surcharge at grade equal to 1 foot of additional soil. This is to account for any LL that may be placed on grade.
 
The IRC may allow minimal reinforcing, but how often do you see foundation walls that are failing after 20 years from frost heave, water infiltration, etc.?

Your 70*h does feel a little arbitrary. I'm with retired on this one - sharpen your pencil on the lateral load calculations and I think you'll find a more reasonable wall design works.
 
Your pressure may be off.....but then again: so may be your loads. The IRC is a prescriptive design based on certain situations. Without seeing your details, your "suspended floor" with a vehicle (on top of another level with a vehicle and other loads) is likely more load than the IRC anticipates. (At least to the best of my recollection.)

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor