Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Interpretation of AASHTO 5.8.2.9, definition of dv

Status
Not open for further replies.

JHart_11

Structural
Joined
Aug 2, 2016
Messages
13
Location
US
The current AASHTO Bridge Design Spec. defines dv, effective shear depth, as the distance between the resultants of the tensile and compressive forces due to flexure. The commentary says this can be determined as dv=Mn(As*fy+Aps*Aps). For a non-prestressed rectangular section with no compression steel, this formula can be whittled down to, dv=d–a/2. In section 5.8.2.9, the definition of dv states, "it need not be less than 0.9de or 0.72h (in.)". My question is, if dv=d-a/2 is larger than 0.9de or 0.72h, do I use that value or the greater of 0.9de vs. 0.72h? I am thinking that the 0.9de or 0.72h statement is just a limiting value and I should use the dv=d-a/2 if larger, but am looking for confirmation from the experts [bigsmile]. Thanks!
 
That's correct, in the case where your physical distance is greater than 0.9d or 0.72h, you can use the true physical distance.
 
Thank you for the quick response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top