Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Interesting ponding/deflection problem

bugbus

Structural
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
540
Location
AU
There was a previous thread about water ponding on slabs that got me thinking about an interesting problem. I have not had any luck solving this theoretically, so for now it remains just a thought experiment.

Imagine a massless plate with elastic modulus E and thickness t that is simply supported on two edges with span of L and width B (shown in (1)). In its unloaded state, the plate is perfectly flat.

The plate is then subjected to some initial bending causing it to deflect by Δ (shown in (2)), and a liquid with unit weight γ is gradually poured onto it. (Ignore the fact the sides of the plate are open).

Finally, the external bending is released so that only the weight of the liquid acts on the plate (shown in (3)).

Questions:
  • What happens to the plate once the initial bending is released?
  • (A) - Will it spring back to its original flat position, displacing the liquid in the process? Or...
  • (B) - Will it settle into a particular deflected shape and achieve equilibrium?
  • Is there some critical combination of initial deflection, plate stiffness, etc. that this outcome hinges on?


1750476427799.png
 
I believe the theoretical answer is B, regardless of the magnitude of the initial (pre-liquid) deflection. Of course you will never get this answer through conventional linear elastic analysis. You would need to allow for the non-linear behaviour associated with large displacement theory. The linearity or non-linearity of the material's behaviour is irrelevant.
 
As an aside, can you give a reference to the "previous thread about water ponding on slabs"? I missed it.
 
Well the linearity of the material would matter, since something like reinforced concrete would be become less stiff as it is loaded, though the question seems more theoretical. I suspect for any practical case you don't really need to account for large displacements causing membrane stresses in the panel, only for geometric non linearity (maybe large delta P-delta is what is meant in the comment).

I think either the stiffness of the roof is such that deflection under some unit load (k) is either (1) greater or (1) lesser than the density of water times that deflection, in which case 1. it should flatten out 2. it's a ponding instability and keeps going. Maybe a third case where they happen to be exactly balanced and the roof stays put, though this doesn't seem possible theoretically, since some load is applied to deflect the roof at first. This leads to other problem with scenario 2 - surely if ponding instability occurs after the load is removed, it would have occured while the load was applied as well. So my position is that provided the structure initially and subject to some continuous rainfall, option A is the result of removing the load.
 
I think I have found a solution (I only say this tentatively) - the derivation is a work in progress (and may be wrong). Essentially this boils down to a 4th order ODE where (d4Δ/dx4)=(Bγ/EI)Δ(x), where Δ(x) is the deflection. The solution is in the form of a sine curve.

Solving, with some algebra, etc., leads to a critical case of: (12γ/Et^3)=(π/L)^4.

Expressed in terms of a critical span length: Lcrit = π(Et^3/12γ)^0.25

I assume that this is the only stable configuration where the weight of the liquid balances the deflection of the beam.

E.g. for a 10 mm thick steel (E = 200,000 MPa) plate filled with water (γ = 10 kN/m3), the span would need to be 3.57 m to reach some equilibrium state.

Anything less and it would spring back to its flat position; anything more and it will become unstable and continue deflecting (assuming there is a continuous supply of liquid to fill the gap that forms).

I will keep working on it. Maybe test it with some FEA to check an example case.

Also interestingly, if the above is all correct, it means that for a plate with the critical span, the actual value of the deflection is arbitrary. The plate will stabilise on whatever initial deflection it is given because the loading is always balanced with the deflection of the beam.
 
Last edited:

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top