Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Imposing displacement rather then applying force?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RobertCT

Mechanical
May 4, 2012
2
Hello all!

I'm working on a problem where I need to determine reaction loads based on a imposed displacement of a system.

I have a component (that can be approximated as a long beam) that will be forced to bend (elastically) by brackets supporting it at various locations, I know how much each bracket / support will move (this displacement is imposed by the circumstances of the problem). I need to be able to determine the reaction loads in each of the brackets at this specific displacement.

Is there any way I can run an analysis in FEMAP where instead of imposing loads, i can impose a final deflected shape and have the analysis give me the required loads at specific locations /nodes?

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Dear Robert,
Oh yes, you can prescribe an enforced displacement using "Model > Load > Nodal > Displacement". But in order to run the analysis you have to prescribe a displacement constraint "Model > Constraint > Nodal" to the same node with the same DOF as you used to prescribe the enforced displacement, if not the NX NASTRAN solver will give you error, OK?.

Best regards,
Blas.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director

IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB: Blog de FEMAP & NX Nastran:
 
try a simple test case to make sure you're doing it right
 
I should have clarified, I use NEI Nastran, will this be an issue?
 
Hi

It's the same approach in NEiNastran.

You constrain the node and than you enforce a displacement on the constrained node.

Good Luck

Thomas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor