Well, you still need a couple of other variables defined to get a technically correct solution, but... we can envelop the extremes.
All these will affect the technically correct answer,
Inlet pressure, 175 psig,
Outlet pressure, ?
Length of the line,
Elevation profile, especially elevation of the inlet and outlet.
With a [red] horizontal [/color] pipe @ 175 psi good targets are theoretically between the following two extremes. The first is keeping the flow fast enough to keep the line clean, the last is to keep the pipe from eroding from particulate matter in the water.
Your 175 psig will allow a maximum rise of up to 400 feet above the point that that pressure was measured, unfortunately without any continuous flow. But you should be able to do most anything between these extremes
1.) 460 gpm with a loss of 1.7 psi)/1000 ft length = total length of about 20 miles.
2.) 1600 gpm with a loss of 17 psi/1000 ft = total length of 2 miles. The 1600 gpm may sound tempting, but you may be letting in other waterhammer gremlins when running at that high a velocity. I suggest a reasonable compromise might be 700 gpm, losing 3.7 psi /1000 ft, for a total distance of up to 7 miles. That would give you a pressure loss of 135 psi, still allowing for up to a 50 foot elevation increase with enough pressure left for a good exit stream.
Decreasing the outlet elevation below the measured pressure point elevation will tend to increase pressure, flow and pressure drop in the line, so do not exceed the pipe pressure rating.
BigInch
![[worm] [worm] [worm]](/data/assets/smilies/worm.gif)
-born in the trenches.