I thought that the PE Civil Structural was ridiculously easy. I'm a practicing structural so the structural part of that was a snap, as one would expect. Mostly just statics. And not even challenging statics. If you did your MS in structural, I suspect that the same would be true for you. As for the civil part:
- I hadn't touched anything civil-ish for 15 years when I wrote the exam, not since college. If you're at the tail end of a civil program, I'd think that you'd be significantly better off.
- For prep, all I did was read the table of contents of the big PPI guide book so that I'd have some hope of finding equations when I needed them.
I thought that the FE exam was actually much more of a near run thing for me than PE Civil / Structural.
When I was an Engi-Toddler, I used to study a lot for the exams. I don't have the time nor the emotional bandwidth for that now that I've matured. So now, I just take the exams without any significant preparation and, if I fail, I take them again. I've taken a ton of the US exams cold and the only time that I failed on the first try was the old Washington state SEIII, which I failed twice. In hindsight, I feel that just winging these things is a very rational approach unless you work for some douche bag employer who is going to peg your salary and all chances for future advancement on whether or not you pass the exam the first time (these employers exist). By winging it, you accomplish two sensible things:
a) Often you pass and do not waste a bunch of valuable time studying.
b) Failing helps you efficiently identify the exams that are worth the additional effort to study for.
If you were an ego free artificial intelligence, this is precisely how you would go about it I feel.