Although I haven't read of any productivity comparisons for history vs non-history-based MCAD programs, Joe Greco (Mr. 3D) did write an article in which he picked the best program (with runnerup) for each of many categories. I will post the month and year of the Cadalyst issue that contained this "awards" article.
Essentially, the Conceptual Modeling award went to IronCAD, which is a non history-based program. IronCAD also won the "Visualization" award for its ease of creating photo-realistic images. If any of you have used this program, you'd know why Joe Greco chose it over all the others. First off, it has catalogs of dozens of solid and hollow shapes that you simply drag into a scene. This alone often saves a nice chunk of time. The other nice thing about IC is that each shape, whether solid or hollow (negative) contains pull handles that allow you to (in real time) change the size of the shape in all (xyz) directions. While this is happening, the dimensions (which are there by default if you wish) are displayed and are changing in real time.
In addition, the IC TriBall can be attached to any feature to move, copy, mirror, etc. This feature alone is worth the price of the software.
I use both IronCAD and Solidworks and it is obvious to me that unless SW makes major changes to its core structure, it will never be as easy to use as a conceptual tool as non-history-based programs. Certainly, it is a very powerful program. However, "fun to use for conceptual modeling" is not a description I would bestow upon it any time soon.