I have a great deal of envy and respect for the people who are good at modelling for FEA, and creating boundary conditions that make sense. The visual results are amazing and help understand the details of the stresses and strains. I just worry about the person reading the FEA results understanding what it looks like in the field and perhaps becoming overconfident in the analysis. Obviously FEA can be used, but taking the calculations out to 6 decimal places may be equally as meaningful as 2 significant figures considering the vast difference between an FEA model and the actual construction. I think FEA should be used when your assumptions are quite close to reality and the precision is warranted. I think that using FEA for calculating the strength of a floating roof pipe leg is no more useful than quick pencil and paper classical buckling equations for a column. It's like using a micrometer to measure the length of a 10 meter long piece of pipe when the pipe is field cut with a torch to fit conditions. Yes it can be done but should it? Does it lead to overconfidence in the results? Selecting the right tool for the job is as important as knowing how to use the tool and interpreting the results...