h0ckeypuck:
Could you describe your jacketed pipe (pipe in a pipe) with specific details? The reason I request this is that there are different configurations, depending on your scope of work. I've used a similar installation in a process plant and my scope was to maintain the process fluid in the liquid state by using a continuous steam jacket on the pipe. The process fluid was a solid at ambient conditions. My pipe ran was extensive and I recall we used 1-1/4" pipe inside 2"; both were sched.40. We used 20-ft lengths of the 1-1/4" - all butt-welded and 100% radiographed. The buttwelds were exposed and not jacketed. All 2" jackets were approximately 19 ft long and we used jumpers from jacket to jacket. This was done to allow flanged connections every 2 or 3 pipe lengths and gave the ability to test these sections individually for leaks by selectively inserting blinds at the flange connections, with a pressure gauge on the jacket. I realize this type of configuration starts to add up in costs due to the jumpers, but the maintenance flexibility and relative ease of locating any leak in a minimum of time gave the justification. Maintenance time was important due to the need to minimize unit downtime.
Your configuration might be different due to a different scope, but staging your jacketing also has other advantages such as good distribution of expansion stresses on the pipe. If you are jacketing for the principle of "double containment (containment of leaks) Then it would seem more justifiable to expend more money towards staging the jacketing - although you might not want to have any "bare" pipe spots at all. That's why I request more details of your needs and scope.
Art Montemayor
Spring, TX